Suchergebnisse

"Inducements in Interstate Relations" published on by Oxford University Press.

"Coercive Diplomacy as Crisis Management" published on by Oxford University Press.

I. Foreign Capital Inducement Law. Law no. 1802, promulgated on August 3, 1966. - II.Enforcement decree of the Foreign Capital Inducement Law. Presidential decree No. 2756, promulgated on September 24, 1966. - III.The working rules for the implementation of the Foreign Capital Inducement Law. Economic Planning Board order No. 43, promulgated Nov. 24, 1966.

Exhibition '10th iteration of 10' is a part of Avoidance-Avoidance project (2012-2017) and was demonstrated during The herbst exhibition "Forms of Distancing'. Avoidance—Avoidance combines a performed play staged amongst exhibited art works. The play has had 10 iterations in 6 countries using 12 actors and has been performed in 5 languages. Each presentation comprises a new edited site-specific script and a new body of accompanying artworks that act as both autonomous artworks and stage devices. The play centres on two characters based on the film director Mary Ellen Bute and her real-life lover and cinematographer Ted Nemeth. The dialogue is a love story which comments on the methods of concealment that are used both in our personal intimate relationships and more broadly speaking in politics where 'trust' and 'transparency' are a valuable currency.

ON THE BASIS OF AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE AND ORGANIZED LABOR IN LATIN AMERICA, THIS ARTICLE ARGUES THAT THE CONCEPT OF CORPORATISM CAN BE DISAGGREGATED TO SHED LIGHT ON DIFFERENT POWER RELATIONSHIPS AND POLITICAL CONTEXTS. THE ANALYSIS FOCUSES ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN "INDUCEMENTS" AND "CONSTRAINTS" IN STATE CONTROL OF GROUPS.

The concept of "corporatism" has usefully called attention to the importance of systems of interest representation based on non-competing groups that are officially sanctioned, subsidized, and supervised by the state. Yet these patterns have appeared in such a remarkable variety of political contexts that this concept may be too broad to be useful. On the basis of an analysis of the relationship between the state and organized labor in Latin America, this article argues that the concept of corporatism can be disaggregated so that it sheds light on rather than obscures the different power relationships and political contexts with which it is associated. The analysis focuses on the distinction between "inducements" extended by the state to win the cooperation of groups and "constraints" through which the state directly controls groups. This disaggregated approach enables one to distinguish more subtly among systems of group representation, to conceive of state-group relations in more interactive terms, and to gain insights into the larger political context.